The U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Sixth Amendment inCrawford.

ReadDavis v Washington 547 U.S. 813 (2006) (attached). Briefly describe what the confrontation clause is and answer the following questions:Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Sixth Amendment inCrawford v. Washington 541 U.S. 36 (2004) may statements made to police during investigation of a crime – though not made with the intent to preserve evidence – be admitted in court without allowing defendants to cross-examine the person who made the original statements? How does the Court distinguish admissible statements from non-admissible statements?Should be at least 500 words in length be original in content and demonstrate a thorough analysis of the topic. With one in text bluebook citation

You may also like