dq 1Research an argument in the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism

dq 1Research an argument in the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism given (e.g., the transcended argument for the existence of God).dq 2Find an argument against a position you hold. This can be in the realm of politics, religion, art, etc. Identify the form of the argument and state whether it is valid or invalid. Then, provide a response.Research an argument in the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism given (e.g., the transcended argument for the existence of God).Find an argument against a position you hold. This can be in the realm of politics, religion, art, etc. Identify the form of the argument and state whether it is valid or invalid. Then, provide a response.

dq 1When it says to construct and ethical argument, what do you consider that to

dq 1When it says to construct and ethical argument, what do you consider that to mean? Explain and discuss with other whether there are objective or subjective standards for ethical arguments.dq 2Find an outside source that argues for some ethical standards in argumentation. Place it in a syllogism and evaluate its position. Comment on another students post.When it says to construct and ethical argument, what do you consider that to mean? Explain and discuss with other whether there are objective or subjective standards for ethical arguments.Find an outside source that argues for some ethical standards in argumentation. Place it in a syllogism and evaluate its position. Comment on another students post.

Details:Your skills that have been practiced throughout the course will be asses

Details:Your skills that have been practiced throughout the course will be assessed in this paper and conclude with you constructing your own argument on a position. Your argument can be a contradiction, a support, or an alteration of the argument youve research. Whichever you choose should be sufficiently supported with materials covered throughout the course and your own outside research.This assignment should continue with the social issue research conducted in Topic 2In 750-1,000 wordsSummarize the position/argument researched. This should be presented in a clear logical form. This includes translating their rhetoric into: premises and conclusion, identifying the category of propositions, and quality and quantity of the parts.Identify the assumptions of the position by drawing inferences from their communicated proposition to their position regarding human dignity.Construct a valid and sound argument that contradicts, challenges, or improves the position of the organization.At least three academic peer-reviewed sources are required for this paper.While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected. In-text citations and references should be presented using APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.This assignment measures programmatic competency4.2: Examine the connections between ethical communication and human dignity.4.4: Construct ethical arguments.Your skills that have been practiced throughout the course will be assessed in this paper and conclude with you constructing your own argument on a position. Your argument can be a contradiction, a support, or an alteration of the argument youve research. Whichever you choose should be sufficiently supported with materials covered throughout the course and your own outside research.This assignment should continue with the social issue research conducted in Topic 2In 750-1,000 wordsAt least three academic peer-reviewed sources are required for this paper.While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected. In-text citations and references should be presented using APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.This assignment measures programmatic competency4.2: Examine the connections between ethical communication and human dignity.4.4: Construct ethical arguments.

COM362 Week 1 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March dq 1 Aristotle described argume

COM362 Week
1 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1
Aristotle described
argumentation as the following: “For to a certain extent all men attempt
to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves, and to attack
others.” Aristotle’s description of argumentation represents his view of
how argumentation is a part of who we are as human beings. Do you agree or
disagree with Aristotle’s viewpoint? Explain why. How has his viewpoint played
a significant role in the historical development of argumentation?

dq 2
Find a blog that
presents and defends an argument within the post. Write a paragraph evaluating
the arguments as either inductive or deductive. Provide the blog link in your
paragraph response. Why do you think identifying these different elements are
important?

COM362 Week
2 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1
When watching or reading
the news, what fallacies do you see other people make most often?

dq 2
Identify a fallacy you
used in a recent discussion with another person. Why did you use that fallacy
and how can you address the concern without use of the fallacy?

COM362 Week
3 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1

Find an example in
society of a dispute that is (1) based on the ambiguity of language and (2) is
not a genuine dispute. Point out the differences and propose how to resolve the
dispute.

dq 2

Take a term that is
related to a social issue you are personally interested in and clearly define
it. For example, defining a right vs. a privilege in the debates on health
care. Comment on another students post by seeing if you can find an exception
that is excluded from the definition given.

COM362 Week
4 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1

Exmine an argument made
in public and translate it to show the categorical propositions and conclusion.
Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Why or why not? Second, if their
premises are true what else can you infer? Analyze another students post.
dq 2

As you are learning
about propositions and contradictions, write out a view that you hold on a
social issue in propositional form. What is the contradiction to your view?
Identify a group that advocates the contradictory view.

COM362 Week
5 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1

Using an argument and
organization, create the logical contradiction of it. Be sure to properly label
the quality and quantity of the propositions.
dq 2
How would you
communicate with someone that holds a different view than yourself in a way
that is logically sound but does not deny the human dignity of the other
person?

COM362 Week
6 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1

Why is it important to
understand how a syllogism functions when it comes to doing advocacy work?
dq 2

Provide an argument in
affirmation of the topic: It is better to protect privacy over security. Your
response should be at least 250 words long and include at least one source
found using resources available from the school’s library.

COM362 Week
7 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March
dq 1

Research an argument in
the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism given (e.g., the
transcended argument for the existence of God).
dq 2
Find an argument against
a position you hold. This can be in the realm of politics, religion, art, etc.
Identify the form of the argument and state whether it is valid or invalid.
Then, provide a response.COM362 Week
8 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 March

dq 1
When it says to
construct and ethical argument, what do you consider that to mean? Explain and
discuss with other whether there are objective or subjective standards for
ethical arguments.

dq 2
Find an outside source
that argues for some ethical standards in argumentation. Place it in a
syllogism and evaluate its position. Comment on another students post.

COM362 Week
1 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1Aristotle described
argumentation as the following: “For to a certain extent all men attempt
to discuss statements and to maintain them, to defend themselves, and to attack
others.” Aristotle’s description of argumentation represents his view of
how argumentation is a part of who we are as human beings. Do you agree or
disagree with Aristotle’s viewpoint? Explain why. How has his viewpoint played
a significant role in the historical development of argumentation?dq 2Find a blog that
presents and defends an argument within the post. Write a paragraph evaluating
the arguments as either inductive or deductive. Provide the blog link in your
paragraph response. Why do you think identifying these different elements are
important?COM362 Week
2 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1When watching or reading
the news, what fallacies do you see other people make most often?dq 2Identify a fallacy you
used in a recent discussion with another person. Why did you use that fallacy
and how can you address the concern without use of the fallacy?COM362 Week
3 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1Find an example in
society of a dispute that is (1) based on the ambiguity of language and (2) is
not a genuine dispute. Point out the differences and propose how to resolve the
dispute.dq 2Take a term that is
related to a social issue you are personally interested in and clearly define
it. For example, defining a right vs. a privilege in the debates on health
care. Comment on another students post by seeing if you can find an exception
that is excluded from the definition given.COM362 Week
4 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1Exmine an argument made
in public and translate it to show the categorical propositions and conclusion.
Does the conclusion follow from the premises? Why or why not? Second, if their
premises are true what else can you infer? Analyze another students post.dq 2As you are learning
about propositions and contradictions, write out a view that you hold on a
social issue in propositional form. What is the contradiction to your view?
Identify a group that advocates the contradictory view.COM362 Week
5 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1Using an argument and
organization, create the logical contradiction of it. Be sure to properly label
the quality and quantity of the propositions.dq 2How would you
communicate with someone that holds a different view than yourself in a way
that is logically sound but does not deny the human dignity of the other
person?COM362 Week
6 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1Why is it important to
understand how a syllogism functions when it comes to doing advocacy work?dq 2Provide an argument in
affirmation of the topic: It is better to protect privacy over security. Your
response should be at least 250 words long and include at least one source
found using resources available from the school’s library.COM362 Week
7 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1Research an argument in
the realm of apologetics and evaluate the syllogism given (e.g., the
transcended argument for the existence of God).dq 2Find an argument against
a position you hold. This can be in the realm of politics, religion, art, etc.
Identify the form of the argument and state whether it is valid or invalid.
Then, provide a response.COM362 Week
8 Discussion 1 & 2 Latest 2018 Marchdq 1When it says to
construct and ethical argument, what do you consider that to mean? Explain and
discuss with other whether there are objective or subjective standards for
ethical arguments.dq 2Find an outside source
that argues for some ethical standards in argumentation. Place it in a
syllogism and evaluate its position. Comment on another students post.

Ethics in the Courts Presentation. Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoin

Ethics in the Courts Presentation. Create a 10- to 12-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you discuss ethics in the court system.Include answers to the following in your presentation:Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.Include speaker notes.Include at least 2 outside sources.

Develop in APA. format:The senior vice president of your company has resigned in

Develop in APA. format:The senior vice president of your company has resigned in the midst of buy-out negotiations. You do not know all of the details but have been selected as a participant in the news conference to be held that afternoon to announce his departure. The news conference will be open to questions from the media so you need to be prepared to answer any inquiries addressed to you.In a report discuss the following:

Topic: Your Change Initiative Will Probably Fail. The No. 1 Reason? Your Employe

Topic: Your Change Initiative Will Probably Fail. The No. 1 Reason? Your Employees. The speed of change is accelerating. To succeed, adroit organizations must understand how to change or die. Change, however, is a people process and achieving success requires an exceptional internal communications strategy. Discuss the principles that enable leading companies/organizations to not just manage the chaos of change, but to embrace it and thrive.Present key information about the topic and provide some basic “do’s and don’ts,” as well as examples of actual organizations that “do it well” and those that do not.Through your research and in your answer, you should determine what professionals and experts say about how organizations and leaders should manage the topic/issue. Briefly explore current business literature to find examples of real organizations that are “doing it right” (how they perhaps hire, train, access, integrate, and communicate with internal and external audiences related to the topic).At the least, please reference (APA) at least three additional sources.