Repeat Problem 7.1 for Chebyshev and maximally flat magnitude functions with the

Repeat Problem 7.1 for Chebyshev and maximally flat magnitude functions with the same value fora,,,,,, but with What conclusion can be drawn about the efficiency of the two approximation functions and about its dependence on stopband attenuation and transition bandwidth? Problem 1 A Chebyshev lowpass filter is required to provide  of attenuation at  with maximum passband attenuation of annz = 0.4 dB in and the degree nc of the function. Repeat the problem for a filter with maximally flat magnitude. Compare the results with respect to degree and Q values.

A Chebyshev lowpass filter is required to provide  of attenuation at  with maxim

A Chebyshev lowpass filter is required to provide  of attenuation at  with maximum passband attenuation of annz = 0.4 dB in and the degree nc of the function. Repeat the problem for a filter with maximally flat magnitude. Compare the results with respect to degree and Q values.

A maximally Hat magnitude transfer function is to be derived such that arm, = 0.

A maximally Hat magnitude transfer function is to be derived such that arm, = 0.02 dB in 0 < to="">< i="" and="" ami„="48" db="" for="" to=""> 2.2. Find the parameters n and s, and use Butterworth tables to the function. Design a test Sallen–Key filter using suitable opamps.

A maximally flat magnitude transfer function is char-acterized by the parameters

A maximally flat magnitude transfer function is char-acterized by the parameters e = 0.075 and n = 7. Determine the minimum attenuation at the stopband frequency oas = 1.85cop. Assume 4 = 980 Hz. Find the transfer function and its poles. relying on Butterworth tables. Design a test a Sallen—Key filter using suitable opamps.