Discuss how the Anglo-American-Soviet alliance came apart in the aftermath of World War II.

Discuss how the Anglo-American-Soviet alliance came apart in the aftermath of World War II. Were the British and Americans justified in pursuing a containment strategy against the Soviets?
PLEASE REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 125 WORDS)
                                      CLASSMATE’S POST
The alliance between the US and Soviet Russia during WWII fell apart after WWII.  Stalin believed that the opening of a second front in Europe was going to be intentionally delayed the Allies so that Russia might be able to continue to bear the German War.  After the death of President Roosevelt in April, and finally the surrender of Germany in May 1945, President Truman met with the Allied leaders in Germany.  The containment policy against Soviet Union is also known as the Cold War foreign policy.  This policy was a response to a series of moves by the Soviet Union to increase Communist influence. Therefore, I believe that we the Americans were justified in pursuing a containment strategy against the Soviets.  If we hadn’t of done this, America might very well be a Communist nation. The alliance between the US and Soviet Russia during WWII fell apart after WWII.  Stalin believed that the opening of a second front in Europe was going to be intentionally delayed the Allies so that Russia might be able to continue to bear the German War.  After the death of President Roosevelt in April, and finally the surrender of Germany in May 1945, President Truman met with the Allied leaders in Germany.  The containment policy against Soviet Union is also known as the Cold War foreign policy.  This policy was a response to a series of moves by the Soviet Union to increase Communist influence. Therefore, I believe that we the Americans were justified in pursuing a containment strategy against the Soviets.  If we hadn’t of done this, America might very well be a Communist nation.

Explain intersectionality.

 
In a 2–3-page paper, address the following:

Explain intersectionality
Explain at least one social philosophy from the textbook. For instance, you might discuss utilitarianism, Rawls, Marx, Nozick, Du Bois, King, or Beauvoir. If the theory has a clear correlate, please discuss it as well.
Illustrate your understanding of both the intersectional and traditional social justice approaches with examples.
Support your account of the theories with citations to the textbook and online lectures in correct APA format. Use this APA Citation Helper as a convenient reference for properly citing resources.

Are there any benefits to nationalism? What are some consequences of nationalism?

 
Nationalism
Review the contents and create a written response in the form of a paragraph using at least five complete sentences that fully answer the question.
1. After assessing the content of the Nationalism folder, what is your opinion of Nationalism? Are there any benefits to nationalism? What are some consequences of nationalism?

Book Review on “America: A Narrative History “tenth edition   Book review

Book Review on “America: A Narrative History “tenth edition  

Book review

Identify:
Author’s content and purpose
Structure
Audience

Evaluate:
Accuracy
Up-to-datedness of the information
The sources used to justify the author’s stance

Respond:
What issues does it raise?
What issues are omitted?
The effect of the book
Your recommendation

Writing a book review
Before reading

Write some questions based on the list below:
Why has the book been written?
When was it written?
What is the scope of the book?
Who is the intended audience?
How accurate is the author’s content?
How (well) is evidence used?
Are there any omissions?
Find out about the author:
Qualifications
Background
Affiliations
Other works (if any)

Structuring the book review
The review should be 2 – 3 pages. (12 point font, double-spaced) 
At the start, put the complete bibliographic information:
Title in full, author, place of publication, publisher, date of publication edition, number of pages.

Your introduction will usually include:
your overall impression of the book
a statement about the author
a statement on the purpose of the book
a statement of the significance of the work
a comment about the relationship between this work and others by the same author, the same subject and the same genre
The body of your review develops the points you want to make:
greater detail on the author’s thesis and a summary of the main points
evaluation of strengths, weaknesses, contribution or bias, and evidence provided by author
the evidence that is the basis of your critique – Quotes should be followed by the page the quote came from. Example “George Washington was from Virginia.” (49) Due to the length of these reviews use direct quotes sparingly. 
The conclusion (last paragraph) includes:
your final assessment
restatement of overall impression
(re)statement of your recommendation

The book review will be graded based on the following rubric: Total possible points 25
Grade Background Summary Evidence Review Mechanical 
5 Gives relevant information about author and intended audience, positions text in scholarly debate Clearly describes thesis, argument and conclusions of text. Shows good understanding of relevant main points and avoids extraneous detail. Perceptively describes and evaluates the kinds of evidence used to support the claims in the text, suggesting other potentially useful sources that would tend to confirm or refute argument. Thoughtful evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of text, pointing to other texts that seem to support or weaken argument. Few errors in spelling, punctuation, capitalization, sentence structure and grammar.

What was the “Era of Good Feelings?” Was it truly an era free of strife?

Was the War of 1812 justified? What were the major weaknesses and strengths of the United States during the war?

Part 2 of 2:
What was the “Era of Good Feelings?” Was it truly an era free of strife?
 
ALSO PLEASE REPLY TO ANOTHER STUDENTS COMMENT BELOW 

The War of 1812 put the U.S. in a difficulty situation.  France and Britain were fighting and both asked for out continued support secretly.  This put us in a position to with choose a side or engage in a war on 2 different fronts which there was no way a young county like the U.S. with no formal military and limited resources could fight successfully or sustain.  A choice had to be made and siding with the French showed that now the U.S. was not just supporting the French but actively fighting against the British.  

Should African-Americans be compensated today for slavery?

PLEASE READ BEFORE BIDDING!!!

Assignment: Ongoing discussion/reflection base on Defending Slavery and the concept of Compensatory Justice.  

Note: You do not have to write three-paragraphs!!! Small, short, quick sentences conveying your point will suffice! Oh by the way, students must enjoy the dialogue!!!

.
The objective for this ongoing discussion board is for students to reflect on Paul Finkelman’s book, Defending Slavery. As the semester progresses, and you complete part or all of the book, then please feel free to reflect, analyze, or opine on any point made by the author and/or a classmate’s postings that relate to the following issue: Should African-Americans be compensated today for slavery? To restate the issue: Today, in 2018, does America owe “anything” to the descents of slaves? 
.
At first glance the above issue may seem simplistic. After careful reading and reflection, however, I am confident that you will appreciate the profound considerations of this dilemma. In light of the sensitive nature of this issue, I am confident that everyone will maintain the proper professional/academic demeanor when discussing it…enjoy the dialogue! Also, please note that all students will submit a critical analysis based Defending Slavery. Please see below and the Book Critique button for further instructions.

.
Students will receive points for each substantive reflection posted up to the maximum of +20 points.  Merely posting a superficial comment willsecure you any points. Your posting must be clear, thoughtful, and reveal a “deep-seeded” appreciation for the reading and or a classmate’s point. Again, this assignment is to ensure a continuous dialogue between students. Let me stress the following point: This assignment is “student driven” and, yes, I will “chime” in when appropriate….enjoy the dialogue!

Which type of European colonization system do you believe had the most significant impact on the history of North America: Spanish, French, or British?

I have a question about history exam and I need a fast answer for it. I need you to cover the question and do not use recourses but explain everything in easy language so I can follow. due at 1:30 A.M meaning after 2 hours please !!

your essay should be 4 paragrpahs:
introduction 
p1: Spanish
p2:French
p3:British
conclusion (you restated your believe of which one you think it is good)

the question 
  
1. Which type of European colonization system do you believe had the most significant impact on the history of North America: Spanish, French, or British? In your answer, be sure to describe the colonization and settlement practices of all three empires and explain why you believe your choice had the largest impact.

What do historians mean by “The Age of Pericles”? What were the political and cultural achievements of this age?

This is a short-answer essay format where you will write on two prompts from a list of five. You will have three hours in which to complete. This assignment is due TODAY.
          Instructions        Select and answer TWO of the FIVE essay questions. Define terms where appropriate. Use general statements to answer the question.  Support your statements with accurate and specific facts.
 

Each Exam essay should include an introduction, body, and conclusion.
Do not use quotations or semi-quotations from the text book. If you simply copy or mostly copy words from your book, rather than using your own words to explain concepts, you are not demonstrating that you understand and are able to answer the questions.  “Copied” answers will receive an F.

1.What do historians mean by “The Age of Pericles”? What were the political and cultural achievements of this age?
2.What role did religion play in the civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt? How did the religion of the ancient Hebrews differ from the religions of Mesopotamia and Egypt?
3.What were the chief characteristics of Benedictine monasticism and what role did it play in the conversion of the Germans to Christianity and in the intellectual life of Europe after the fall of Rome?
4.Discuss the political organization of the empire established by Charlemagne. Also include the disintegration of this empire after his death.
5.What were the main problems that Rome faced during the last century of the Republic? Include how Augustus attempted to resolve each of those problems.

1 2 3 38