Write a one-page (400 words) review on an article about the subject of operating systems that appeared in a recent (since Jan 2016) computing magazine or academic journal. Give a summary of the article, including the primary topic, your own summary of the information presented, and the author’s conclusion. Give your personal evaluation of the article, including topics that made the article interesting to you and its relevance to your own experience. Be sure to cite your source (APA referencing).
Need to write one essay with 1000-1300 words on any one topics out of five topics attached in file. Need very good quality writing. Karl K. Karlson decides to start a website called Aryans R Us. The website he envisions will have several different parts to it. One is to provide Karl and his white supremacist friends to post articles they have written. The second is a sort of message board type people for white Supremacists to meet and discuss issues of importance to them. Third is a sort of eBay type auction site in which all the things sold are Nazi and Neo-Nazi memorabilia.Should Karl be allowed to start this website (or I guess more accurately, should it be made illegal for him to host his website in the United States)? Why or why not?[TO BE CLEAR: I am not asking you to tell me whether you think the views Karl has are right or whether you think Karl is a bad person. I’m going to bet pretty much every one of you disagrees with Karl. The question is even if we don’t agree with anything we say, should it be illegal for a website promoting ideas and memorabilia tied to hate speech to exist.]These are the questions I want you to answer in this essay. Begin by laying out the case and telling me whether you think Karl should be allowed to start his website. Then lay out an in depth argument for why Karl should or should not be allowed to make his website. Things to consider in your argument include the importance of free speech, the negative consequences of hate speech, the falseness or immorality of Karl’s views, etc. Make sure that you present your considerations clearly and with a nice structure. Include signposts and remember to make it clear why you are saying each of the things you say. Conclude with a short summary of your argument.
Paper #3: Creating your Own Argument Choose only one option. For this assignment, you will enter the conversation on higher education by creating your own argumentresponding to one of the two options below. Each of the two options is broad. You must find a way to narrow your focus and then find two articles from our book that you can pull in to support your argument and/or use as naysayers. Prompt 1: In the 21st what can colleges do to help students graduate and have successful careers and lives? Don’t create a list of things colleges an do. Focus on a specific need students have and think about what came up in our readings. You must support your argument with at least two and no more than three sourcesfrom the “Is College the Best Option” section of They Say/I Say as well as the Sara Goldrick-Rab and Barack Obama articles or the TSIS Blog. Do not use any other sources. Use actual articles and not the introduction to the section in the book. Use the templates and techniques from the chapters. Prompt 2: In the 21st century should everyone go to college? Why or Why not? You must support your argument with at least two and no more than three sourcesfrom the “Is College the Best Option” section of They Say/I Say as well as the SaraGoldrick-Rab andBarackObama articlesor the TSIS Blog. Use actual articles and not theintroduction to the section in the book.Do not use any other sources. Use the templates and techniques from the chapters. Your paper will: Bring in information from the readings using techniques from Chapters 1, 2, and 3. Respond using the techniques from Chapters 3, 4, and 5. Utilize the information and techniques in Chapters 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11. We’ll practice and cover these specific areas as we move through the drafting and revision process. Be in MLA format. See the Sample MLA Paper on Blackboard. Keep in mind: Your task is not as simple as agreeing or disagreeing with one of the authors we’ve read. Rather, you need to figure out for yourself what colleges can do to support 21stcentury students OR whether in the 21stcentury everyone should go to college and then support your point of view effectively. Review what the various authors have to say on the topic you chose. Make sure you understand and can summarize their arguments. Then think about whether you agree or disagree with their positions and why. How do their ideas influence your own point of view? Mark passages that reinforce your ideas?in agreement or disagreement?as you read. Choose at least two and no more than three articles from the text that you would like to use to support your argument or to use as opposition to your argument. Make connections between the various sources you use. Do they agree or disagree with each other? Finally bring these ideas together to form your argument and your thesis. Your thesis in this argument should summarize the point you want to make in your paper, the conclusion you want your reader to reach with you, the goal you hope to accomplish. Each of your body paragraphs should clearly help you prove/support your argument. Don’t forget about the sandwich method and the templates from the textbook. Use quotations to define terms and concepts and to offer examples of those ideas that reinforce your position. Be sure to add your own ideas to support your position. Be sure to include naysayers/skeptics (Chapter 6) and make your topic matter (Chapter 7). It’s fine to use sources you’ve used before, but you may not go back to Paper 1 or Paper 2 and copy sentences and sections you’ve already written. Doing so is a form of plagiarism. You must create a new paper for Paper 3. Your critical thinking and support scores will depend on your fulfillment the goals of the assignment and use of the terms and techniques from the chapters. This week, review the articles and do some notetaking and prewriting. Review your notes and annotations. You must do prewriting to complete this paper successfully. Use the planning sheet and outline format for your paper. Sources: 2 articles total, no more than 3, and all must come from our book or the blog.
See Project Descriptions for Film Paper in our Syllabus.Select a film (or group of films) and film genre from a specific decade and write 900 words (minimum) analytical paper detailing that film’s and that genre’s influence on American and global culture — both then and now — and how culture, in turn, influenced and shaped the cinema. While you should feel free to use both primary and secondary source citations, in these papers I am interested more in your critical thinking and the use you make of your research than in your prowess with footnoting (which I hope you have already developed in your English classes).Tech specs: minimum 900; 1-inch margins all around; 12 pt. font; double- spaced; name, title and page number in footer or header on every page; title your paper, centered, in bold font (you can use either the title of the film[s] or, better yet, create an essay title (that could include the name[s] of the film[s]).For these Film Papers, you can consider, comment (and expand on), and interconnect the aesthetic and technical aspects of the films as you did in the Film Reports assignment but in more detail, such as:• editing, montage, filmic structure• cinematography, camerawork, lighting• directing• screenwriting• acting• production design, sets, costumes, special effects, style• music and soundEqually (if not more) important will be to consider and write about the following (as you will have done in your Film Reports):• what (and how) do movies mean?• theme, content, genre, intention, audience• social dimension and function: what the film says and means about the world, and particularly American culture (in all its broad meanings and permutations)• personal dimension: how the film affects you personally (identification, engagement, pleasure, excitement, alienation, boredom — how and why?)